Pilot · planned
$30per certified bed per month.
180 days, prepaid.
Business model
Facilities pay a planned subscription per certified bed. The pilot measures value against the facility’s own baseline; clinicians do not pay.
See how the pilot worksFacilities pay. Clinicians do not. No placement fee, take rate, or charge per hire, shift or file.
per certified bed per month.
180 days, prepaid.
per certified bed per month.
per certified bed per month.
Founder-confirmed pricing plan, October 1, 2026. These are planned prices, not executed contracts.
Production list-price illustration
Multiply the certified-bed count by the planned production list rate. The illustration shows monthly list-price arithmetic; it does not estimate savings or customer revenue.
Production list-price illustration using the October 1, 2026 plan. The actual contract rate is subject to the signed-savings cap below. Pilot terms are stated separately above.
The planned production rate is the lesser of list price and one third of savings signed by the facility’s finance lead.
A pilot establishes the baseline and measures the work. Conversion requires a separate agreement. The commercial test is whether the measured value supports a recurring subscription. The facility’s finance lead signs the savings used to set the rate.
Pricing for organizations without certified beds remains to be set. End-to-end operations at $150 to $200 per certified bed per month is a future pricing goal.
The economic test
A site-specific baseline should distinguish cash saved, staff capacity released and additional contribution. They answer different questions.
Proposed measurement framework · agreed period
Net benefit = realized cash savings + incremental contribution − all incremental operating costs − full deployment outlay.
For the same period, ROI is net benefit divided by total incremental cost. Payback is the first month cumulative net cash becomes nonnegative, including deployment outlay. Ongoing run-rate economics exclude one-time setup but retain ongoing costs.
Rōvn must separately measure revenue against its own implementation, support, vendor and model costs. Lower customer effort alone does not prove sustainable delivery. Track cost per accepted outcome and repeatability across the agreed facility scope before claiming attractive margins.
October 7, 2026 proposed evaluation method. No savings, ROI or margin outcome is claimed here. Actual baseline and signed measurement terms govern; the approved per-bed pricing plan above is unchanged.
Inspect the smaller-facility delivery test →The model is designed to make the existing workforce easier to operate, through hiring, readiness, renewals and the next authorized workflow.
The broader career network is an expansion thesis. Potential intelligence products need their own buyer and economics; they are not included as current revenue or added to these planned prices.
Read the 180-day pilot plan →The planned unit ties the subscription to facility scale while supporting recurring workforce operations. A charge for every hire or check would price individual transactions. A bed-based subscription instead needs to earn its place through the continuing usefulness of the product, including periods with fewer new hires.
That creates a specific delivery obligation: keeping current requirements, renewals, handoffs and the operating record useful after the first start. More clicks or more automated messages do not justify the price. A facility should be able to identify the recurring work supported and the value that survives the full cost of delivery.
Readiness and Operator are planned commercial tiers. The binding workflow scope, service responsibilities, exclusions and permitted data routes belong in the agreement; a price label alone does not authorize every capability in the vision package. The long-term $150–$200 goal depends on materially broader value and is not added to present subscriptions.
The signed-savings cap constrains the planned production price. The facility’s investment return then depends on all of its incremental costs, including time and cash spent outside the subscription. Those are two different calculations.
The planned list is $6,000 per month. If the finance lead signs $12,000 in monthly savings on the agreed measurement basis, one third is $4,000. The lower amount is $4,000 per month.
For a separate 12-month return illustration, assume those $12,000 monthly savings are realized cash savings, with no extra contribution. Assume $2,000 per month of other incremental operating costs and $12,000 of one-time deployment outlay. Total savings are $144,000; subscription is $48,000; other operating costs are $24,000; deployment is $12,000. Net benefit is $60,000 on $84,000 of incremental cost, or approximately 71% ROI.
Under those same assumptions, recurring monthly net cash is $6,000 and cumulative cash reaches break-even at the end of month two. If the gains arrive later, operating costs increase or the measured savings do not become actual spending reductions, payback changes and may never occur. The model must show that case too.
All savings, costs and timing in this example are invented inputs to explain arithmetic, not a customer result or forecast. Production pricing, measurement periods and any later rate adjustment require agreement. The production cap does not create a refund, guarantee or automatic change to the prepaid pilot.
For Rōvn, the deployment needs its own cost record: implementation hours, ongoing support, vendor checks, model usage, infrastructure and recovery work. Track these against contracted revenue and accepted outcomes. Prepaid pilot cash is a cash-timing fact; it does not prove profitable recurring delivery.
We intend to look for improving repeat deployments: more reviewed configuration reused, fewer customer requests needed to establish the operating map, and lower support effort for a comparable accepted outcome. Reuse must preserve each facility’s private policies and evidence. A deployment template can travel; confidential customer context cannot.
The smaller-facility test is particularly useful. If a smaller customer cannot reach a useful outcome within its agreed effort budget, simplify the package before expanding volume. If delivery remains intensely manual, price and scope need to reflect that reality before subscription revenue is described as scalable.
Commercial reporting should therefore distinguish contracted beds, activated beds, recognized revenue, cash collected, renewal decisions and delivery cost. None of those is established by the current non-binding letters. The commercial evidence chapter explains where the company stands.